報告題目🙋🏼♂️：Brains in Vats? Don't Bother!
報告人： Peter Baumann （美國Swarthmore College哲學系教授🤸🏽♀️、系主任）
主持人👵🏻： 郁 鋒 （EON4哲學系 講師）
報告時間🧑🦳👩🏻⚕️：2015年7月2日（周四）下午3:00—4:30
報告地點🧑🎤：哲學系2102會議室
報告摘要：Contemporary discussions of epistemological skepticism - the view that we do not and cannot know anything about the world around us - focus very much on a certain kind of skeptical argument involving a skeptical scenario (a situation familiar from Descartes’ First Meditation). According to the argument, knowing some ordinary proposition about the world (one we usually take ourselves to know) requires knowing we are not in some such skeptical scenario S; however, since we cannot know that we are not in S we also cannot know any ordinary proposition. One of the most prominent skeptical scenarios is the brain-in-the-vat-scenario: An evil scientist has operated on an unsuspecting subject, removed the subject’s brain and put it in a vat where it is kept functioning and is connected to some computer which feeds the brain the illusion that everything is “normal”. This paper looks at one aspect of this scenario after another – envatment, disembodiment, weird cognitive processes, lack of the right kind of epistemic standing, and systematic deception. The conclusion is that none of these aspects (in isolation or in combination) is of any relevance for a would-be skeptical argument; the brain-in-the-vat-scenario is irrelevant to and useless for skeptical purposes. This paper also offers a brief sketch of an error-theory which would explain why the brain-in-the-vat-scenario can, in contrast, seem so utterly relevant to discussions of epistemological skepticism. Given that related scenarios (e.g., involving evil demons) share the defects of the brain-in-the-vat-scenario, the skeptic should not put any hopes on Cartesian topoi.
